Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Fight for nothing?????

What is the best credibility should be in a leader?????their skills in delivering speech...It is not that their leadership is not the main skills that he should have but normally people who are good in giving speech normally are meant to be a leader. what is a leader if they do not have any skills to convince people. I do believe that tongue is powerful as a battalion of army.As for last week we are told to discuss on the speech by two leader Hitler and Winston Churchill.

"What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory. Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terrors, victory, however long and hard the road may be. For without victory, there is no survival." -Winston Churchil-

such a line of word from a person who want to convince his people. At that time, France was the first concern for Churchill because Hitler was already in place in the Rhineland, capable of destroying the country with one order. Churchill tried as hard as he could to keep France in the war, but his brave offer of the Act of Union was denied and France surrendered to Germany without a fight. Britain was now alone and almost unarmed. At this point, almost any leader would have seen defeat, but Churchill would not let this happen. The safety of Britain all depended on a few of her best fighter pilots. Churchill did not plan or direct the Battle of Britain on which the future of mankind depended, but it was he who encouraged and deployed indomitable strength behind the British pilots whose odds of victory were slim. Despite bad odds, the British pilots prevailed and drove the German planes away. The country rallied behind the leadership of Churchill and hoped that he would to lead them to victory. 

Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler are arguably the two most important figures of World War II, if not the twentieth century. Churchill served as prime minister of Great Britain during the war while Adolf Hitler led Germany. Though the two men never met, it is certain that they were mortal enemies. The two's differences are common knowledge: Churchill championed democracy, while Hitler advocated totalitarianism. However, the pair also shared similarities that are not so well-known. 

3 comments:

  1. War, war and war everybody claim that they are right. but when mother nature answered, nobody will get exception. think my brother, nobody is perfect and i am nobody!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Both of them are cowards in my opinion, they sent people to the battlefronts but they themselves just giving orders and sat in the administrators place saving their a**es. Just plain cowards! should've join the war themselves. Cool blog u 'av 'ere mate!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Everyone has their own opinion about these two leaders. For me, the dictatorship and brutality are to be avoided because it can harm the peoples and also the nation itself. BUT, their spirits and courage in leadership are good to be follow in a certain way!

    ReplyDelete